The Lie Of Teen Sex

21 January 2011

Although we don't intend every Romance Academy blog to be about things we saw on the tele that week, this week was particularly special in broadcast land and there is no way we’re keeping quiet.

[Apologies for the lack of pictures this week, peeps, when something needs saying, it needs saying.]

So, Wednesday night saw Channel 4 reach an all time low with their deliberately salacious programme, The Joy of Teen Sex. For those of you who didn’t see it, TJOTS was a programme that pitched itself as a ‘frank and sometimes shocking look at the world of teenage sex, complete with fears, fright and fun’ (4od). Because (as they say in the first 5 minutes of the programme) sex can be the most important thing in a teenager’s life.

Lie.

Way to set up a programme. If you know any teenagers you’ll know that this is utter rubbish. But, maybe if I was a teenager hearing that and felt that actually, GCSE’s are the most important thing in my life right now, I might be worried that there is something wrong with me.  And, if I were the parent of a teenager, I’d also be worried that my teen was sex obsessed and out compromising themselves every weekend. But it doesn’t stop there. To add to this, we are also told that:

“Although the age of consent is 16, by that time the average teen has slept with a least 3 people. “

Another lie.

The reality is that most 16 year olds have not slept with anyone.

Young people, if you are reading this and you haven’t slept with anyone by the time you’re 16 and beyond; do not feel pressured. There is NOTHING wrong with you.

Can you believe that we even need to say that?

This is a programme made by adults, for young people, supposedly. Yet it was shown after the watershed and you have to be 18 (confirmed by ticking a box) to watch it online. It seems as though there is some confusion as to who this programme is really for and it showed. How dare we contribute to, nay, encourage a culture of overt sexualisation one minute and then be mortified when our teens engage in risky business, the next?! Or why have a watershed in the first place?

This idea can be summed up by The Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF), a theory developed in the 1980's, that talks about how communication of an event or threat can, once passed through intermediate stations (such as programmes like The Joke of Teen Sex), become either amplified or attenuated by the receiver (i.e., us) and then normalized. 

Basically, if we are telling young people that STI’s are on the rise and that they are under more pressure to have ‘more adventurous sex than ever’ and then see an increase in the damaging consequences of these incidences, we can’t be surprised? The response should never be programmes like The Joy of Teen Sex. A prime example of SARF.

This utterly irresponsible statement from one of the show's advisors, also sums up this theory:

"I think sometimes when we talk about teen sex in this country we become very negative about it and talk about STI's and teen pregnancies and all of those things and although it's important to address that, I think it's also important that we celebrate it and we say to young people, it's okay that you're engaging in sex, it's fine to have fun with it just be safe and enjoy it."

Is that not giving countless teenagers everywhere permission to sleep around?

Unbelievable.

Yes, sex is fun, yes it can be really enjoyable, but we need to start helping our teenagers understand sexual context. We can tell them about the risks all we like and it is important that we do that, but information alone will not prevent another teenager falling foul of the consequences of meaningless sex. ‘Safe sex’ is not limited to just contraception and the mechanics of sex.

As I sat yelling at the TV on Wednesday night I thought about all the young people I’ve seen who have been emotionally damaged from giving too much. Who slept with someone because they felt pressured/didn’t know they could say no/because they wanted to feel loved.

Yeah, let’s really ‘celebrate’ that.

We have become a nation that is obsessed with the act of genital penetration. But what we never hear is that sex is, amongst other things, about identity - the desire to be known, and surely one of the most intimate things you can do with a person. The physical can never removed from the emotional – sex isn’t safe just because he’s wearing a condom in the same way that it is never ‘just sex’.

Rachel Gardner (Director of RA), has a phrase that she often uses whenever we’re speaking about this issue and that is: “If it ain’t modeled, it ain’t mimicked.”  If we want our teens to achieve full maturation, we cannot keep selling them this fast food approach to sex. We have to help them to grow up. We have to stop telling them that being better at sex will make them a better lover and encourage them to delay sexual activity for a meaningful relationship. And on top of that make it absolutely clear that ‘perfect’ sex isn’t the key to maintaining a successful relationship. We have to begin to model things we want for our young people in our own relationships: love, faithfulness, commitment, trust and communication, of which sex is an expression.

This is why TJOTS was so shocking. It was raw. It was just bodies. It was sexual positions and piercings without even a mention of the emotional implications of ‘shagging’.  There was no talk of relationships, commitment, emotions, love (real love) or even joy, as denoted by the title. Famous Composer, Richard Wagner once said: “Joy is not in things, it's in us”. The 'Joy' of Teen Sex made sex a 'thing' and forgot the 'us'. There is no 'joy' in sex taken out of context or sex used for purely selfish gratification.

We were also shown the tragic story of Rachel, a teenage girl, who’d lost her virginity at 13 and had an abortion by 16, refusing to take any form contraception. Yes, this is frightening and we all react to it, but what is scarier is her lack self-esteem and self-awareness. This ‘extreme’ behaviour is only a symptom of something much deeper. Who is telling her that to gain love and acceptance, she doesn’t need to sleep with boys? That actually, she’s precious and can choose when and whom she gives herself to?

How far can a contraceptive injection heal the emotional damage?

But telling her truths about herself and helping her to realise her value, will. Where is Rachel’s dad whilst she is out seeking acceptance? Where is he to tell her that she is beautiful inside and out? Infact where are the good men telling boys to treat women with respect?

I know you're out there.

Let me tell you now, as an "independent, earn my own money, drive my own car, woman":  Men, you are needed.

You’re not an accessory or even a bonus. You are essential. Girls need their dads to tell them that they are precious and valued so that they won’t need to search for it elsewhere. You can help turn the tide. You can stop ‘buying’ into commodity sex and stand for something more.

The more we buy into the notion that sex is cheap, the more we are saying that relationships are cheap and the cheaper relationships become, the cheaper we (people) also become. This will be our legacy.

There is no doubt that many of you will have watched that programme open-mouthed and in despair. BUT, all is not lost. There are lots of things we can do, that don’t involve cotton-wool-ing our children or burning our television sets. Let's be proactive. Let's fight for our young people. Let's listen to them. 

If these sorts of attitudes are going to be so easily promoted to our teens, we need to be on hand to help them interpret them until the change comes (and it will.)

Romance Academy train youth practitioners to handle these hot topics with young people in a way that allows them to grow into an understanding of the real meaning of safe relationships and sex.

If you’d like to become a Romance Academy leader and work in or with a youth-sympathetic organization, then get yourself on one of our training courses. 

Click here to find out more.

Or if you just want to find out a bit more about the work that we do then come and find us at one free taster sessions up and down the country.

Click here

If you want to read another response to this particular programme, then check out Dr Petra’s Blog: http://www.drpetra.co.uk/blog/the-joy-of-teen-sex/

 

Comments

Apologies for the late

Apologies for the late comment! I am a virgin (and saving sex for marriage) and whilst at almost 22 I fall outside the youth work remit I too have been emotionally damaged by giving too much (although I thankfully stopped short of sex). If it's had consequences for me, an adult woman, how much worse must it be for teenagers? It makes me wish there was something like Romance Academy for adults - plenty of people my age and older have been taken in by the lie of 'it's just sex' and ignoring the emotional consequences.

Yeah the show totally shocked

Yeah the show totally shocked me too. I am 19 and a virgin and have chosen to keep it that way until I'm in a committed and meaningful relationship- though I wouldn't assume superiority over anyone that hasn't chosen that.

The thing that really got me about the show was how much it made me feel like there is, as RA acknowledged, something wrong with me for the way that I live. Which is firstly ridiculous as I'm not at risk from any of the physical or emotional consequences... but also, if I have made this decision based on my strong [& balanced, I think, naturally] values and opinions and it still managed to make me feel this way, what is it feeding into the minds of other young people?? :S

Teenagers need more relationship education

Great blog, I think you're absolutely right. As a teenager I had a skewed perception that relationships were all about sex, I'd slept with 7 men, all of them older than me, looking for love, compassion and commitment.

It wasn't until the time when I met someone who took an interest in getting to know me - but told me he wouldn't have sex with me - that I learned the worth of myself and realised all the emotional damage that being promiscuous in my teens had done to me. At the time I thought it was normal and that I was 'just having fun', but I didn't realise that I was attracting all the wrong men, none of whom were able to give me the commitment and appreciation that I was actually looking for. In turn, it made me think that I wasn't worth much.

I think teens are responsible enough to make their own choices - and it is vital that they do so - but I don't think our society does them many favours in helping them understand sex and relationships beyond the 'what-goes-where' and 'what-feels'good' basics. How upsetting that this approach is being encouraged by Channel 4.

What is more worrying is that the 'twenty-somethings' I'd been with in my teens thought that it was ok, normal even, to be sleeping with a teenager 'no-strings-attached'... I wonder where they get that attitude from?!

The Joke of Teen Sex

Agree with what you've said 100%. I felt that the story of Rachel and her mum was heart-breaking. Through what her mum described about her actions (particularly in repsonse to when a short-term relationship she's been in goes south), it's clear that she's doing stuff that's self destructive, if she's drowning her sorrows drink and drugs to numb the pain, sorting out contraception isn't going to fix that. Giving the two of them a book to write to each other (sweet though it may be) won't solve the deeper problem of her not knowing her worth, and having the capacity to deal with her emotions and the situations that arise in her life.

The whole thing came across as hugely presumptuous as to what young people think about when it comes to sex (there's no point in even bothering to mention relationships - there was scarce evidence that such things should really matter) and it gives the vast majority very little credit in my opinion. As such the "L" -word was absent too. (No, not lesbians, as Scott Pilgrim fans, and perhaps the producers of the programme might suggest) but love. Emotion. Expression of real feelings between people - not even a hint.

Keep doing what you do so well guys, because with nonsense like this on TV, our youth need all the loving help that they can get.

I agree with almost every

I agree with almost every point you made - I watched the program to see if it was going to be the first to actually break through and be a really educational one about teenagers sex lives, but it was just as awful as one would expect. Not enough evidence, no sources for those very dubious 'statistics' you rightly site, and a very judgemental attitude on the part of the professionals involved. The producer on Twitter repeated comments on the show along the lines of 'ew! penis!' which showed clearer than any analysis how far they thought of the program as educational.

However I do disagree on your generalisation that teenagers having sex is bad, and must necessarily lead to people being pressured into sex. This of course happens, and happens with people far older, but to say that because teenagers can enjoy sex that they are therefore being pressured into it is incorrect and unhelpful.

Let's not forget when we talk about teen sex that we are not just talking about 13-15 year-olds, but 16-19 year olds - young people old enough to be working, be married or vote. To say that they cannot be really enjoying sex or have a healthy sex life is patronising, and if that attitude is used then they will ignore other advice you have to offer. Of course they should be practising safe sex, of course they should not be being taken advantage of, and of course they should have access to all the information they need. But there is no reason why they should not be doing it, given all that.

I also disagree that men are needed - what's needed is for people to fill that role, whether they be men or women, and for *society* to fill that role. But the idea that girls need to be told they're pretty (in itself a meaningless concept) is a little patronising.

Thank you for your comments.

Thank you for your comments. Some really interesting points there - what does anyone else think?

We are in no way out to patronise teenagers. We're sorry if it felt like that. We work with them all the time and we know that they are not lemmings!

What we disagree with, is adults creating an attitude/culture around sex that gives permission for certain unhelpful behavior amongst teenagers, in particular those under 16. We do have a responsibility and that's what we're passionate about.

You're absolutely right that young people aged 16+ are free to make that choice and we too would want them to practice safe sex, but we can't help but have in mind the teenagers who we often talk to, who have been so hurt by sex (even sometimes safe sex) that we always want to shout loud about the fact that relationships are always more than just sex and they can say no.

We also totally agree that society has a massive role to play in bringing up children, but to say that men are not needed, is to write them off, which is what society has done. It is widely recognized that father's have a unique role to play (see Britain's Missing Dad's from this weeks Panorama: http://www.bbc.co.uk/i/xxl5q/) and we want to encourage that whenever we can.

Thank you so much for your comments. Keep em coming!

I was appauled at this

I was appauled at this programme and have officially complained to ofcom. I hope that you will all join me in making sure these types of programmes don't grace our screens again!